"After the defeat of the Soviet Red Army in Afghanistan, a great illusion emerged in Pakistan's macro-politics towards playing the role of a regional power, based on which the Pakistanis believe that the creation of a protectorate Afghanistan can bring the following benefits to them:
• Gaining strategic depth in confronting India,
• Access to the untouched resources of Afghanistan,
• Using Afghanistan as a base to spread their influence in Central Asia,
• Access to an unconditional transportation route to Central Asia, and
• Eliminating the problem of the Durand Line (the common border between Pakistan and Afghanistan).

He says elsewhere:
... The Pakistani nation is our brother, we have a common culture and have had relations throughout history.
We are not thinking of unnecessary conflicts in any way and we do not want to create a crisis in the region.
I emphasize again that until Pakistan changes its strategy; Anyone who has any analysis other than this is mistaken.
... Pakistan, in its confrontation with India, according to its own opinion, with the ambitions of its military generals; expects something higher than friendship from us (Afghanistan).
If Pakistan’s only desire was friendship with the Afghan people, there would be no problem at all.
... My opinion about Pakistan’s policy is clear: every country has the right to seek its interests at the national and international levels, but unfortunately, Pakistan, as a neighboring Islamic government, has used the most cruel methods to implement its strategy in Afghanistan, in a way that history has rarely seen.*”

But unfortunately, these views and responsible positions of his remained unheard among the people of some parts of the country because Pakistan has always had the skill and capacity to pit the interests of Afghan ethnic and religious political groups against each other in line with its own strategic interests.

Undoubtedly, as long as the Afghan rulers and statesmen have a negative, exclusionary, and one-dimensional political culture based on ethnic nationalism in governing the country, they will provide this opportunity to the Pakistani rulers so that they can effectively dominate and condemn the country's ethnic political factions and turn them against each other.
This unsympathetic political approach has continued to enter the Afghan political arena since the 1970s after the victory of the coup of the republic of martyr Sardar Daoud (1973).

Toryalai Ghiasi: Representative of the national hero Ahmad Shah Massoud in Iran